In a writ petition challenging proceedings before the District Magistrate under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Court dismissed the petition as premature because the District Magistrate had not yet passed any order or ascertained contentions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
ARUN MISHRA & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Satender Saten Verma with Mr Rahul Verma, Advocates.
versus SAROJINI DEVI & ANR ..... Respondents Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 08.07.2019
CM No.29852/2019
W.P.(C) 7172/2019 & CM No.29851/2019
a view on the rival contentions. The parties are not precluded from urging their respective contentions before him.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 08, 2019 MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of proceedings before the District Magistrate under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is maintainable when no order has be
ARUN MISHRA & ANR
SAROJINI DEVI & ANR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
