The petitioner sought to withdraw the present writ petition. The withdrawal was accepted and the petition was dismissed accordingly. The pending application was disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
ISRAR ALAM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Urfee Haider, Advocate.
versus
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Zahid Hanief, Advocate for Mr Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 05.07.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 05, 2019 MK
ISRAR ALAM
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DELHI
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
