The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition due to typographical errors. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh and disposed of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
AMIT BAGGA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Itisha Gulati and Mr Rakesh Wadhwa, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr J. P. N. Shahi, Advocate for R-1 ad R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 05.07.2019
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 05, 2019 MK
Amit Bagga
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
