Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition to file a fresh one. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeev Lochan and Mr. Hemant Sharma, Advs.
versus
THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Vajani, SC for SDMC with Mr. P. Anand and Mr.Jatin, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to enable the petitioner file a fresh writ petition with better prayers. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JULY 04, 2019 /aky
CAPTAIN A C MALHOTRA
THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
