Petitioner instituted a writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn by its counsel. The High Court dismissed the petition and connected application in order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
..... Petitioner
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Naman Tandon and Mr. Vikas, Advs. for SDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition and connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JULY 04, 2019 /aky
HONSHU BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
