Petitioners sought a stay of the ICSI Board of Discipline's order finding them guilty of bringing disrepute to the profession. The court dismissed the petition, noting no faulted grounds were shown and no appeals were filed against the impugned order.
The prayer to stay the impugned order was refused; the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24 & 30
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Manoj Kohli, Advocate for R1. Mr R. D. Makheeja, Advocate for R-2.
AND
30.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Manoj Kohli, Advocate for R1. Mr R. D. Makheeja, Advocate for R- 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 04.02.2019
CM No.5037/2019 in W.P.(C) 1106/2019 CM No. 5246/201 in W.P.(C) 1165/2019
W.P.(C) 1106/2019 W.P.(C) 1165/2019
have not preferred any appeal against the order dated 07.01.2019, as yet. 7. In this view, the present petition is dismissed. However, it is clarified that the petitioners are not precluded from filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The petitioners are also not precluded from filing a separate petition to assail the impugned order on merits.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2019 MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order staying the Board of Discipline's decision should be granted pending the constitution of the Appellate Authority.
Abhimanyu Upadhyaya
Debasis Dixit
Union of India
Institute of Company Secretaries of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
