Chander Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Thin administrative order. No substantive decision recorded. Matter remanded on board due to absence of counsel on the second call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
CHANDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 18.01.2019
None for the parties, even on the second call.
Let the matter remain on board.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JANUARY 18, 2019 /aky
CHANDER SINGH
STATE OF HARYANA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court