property. Admittedly, the said property is let out to a private party from whom the rent is being realized which is stated to be to the tune of Rs.6,00,000/- per month or so. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit not only for partition but also for realization of mesne profits part of which pertains to this commercial property and in case a receiver is not appointed or a direction is not issued to the Receiver to take the constructive possession of both the properties the defendant no 1 and his daughters are only going to fritter away the property but also making unjust enrichment by realizing the rent or using the same to their own benefit and to the detriment of the plaintiff. Further, the trial as the common knowledge goes, is likely to take considerable time. This will cause serious prejudice to the interest of the plaintiffs in as much as by the time the trial concludes the of the defendant no. 1 and his daughters would have realized substantial amount of money from the said property as rental to their advantage. The defendant no. 1 and his daughters have already realized the amount for which they have not been accounted, and therefore, keeping in view the principle of equity, fair play and justice apart from the property being frittered away, I consider it just and proper to appoint an officer of this court as the Receiver of the aforesaid two properties for the purpose of efficient management, protection, preservation, maintenance, upkeep of the suit properties and also the realization
