Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition and application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Dhriti Sarin, Ms. Aakanksha Sharma, Mr. Sagar Bansal, Advocates
versus
THE INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES OF INDIA AND ANR.
..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.D. Makheeja, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
% 21.01.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has instructions to withdraw the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 21, 2019 pkb
Aditya Rungta
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India
S Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
