The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw on instructions. No substantive decision was rendered.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7 & 8
RNG CABLES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner AJAY GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Adv.
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Std. Counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 21.01.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petitions.
W.P.(C) 1952/2017 and W.P.(C) 1969/2017 are dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 21, 2019 ‘pv’
RNG CABLES PVT. LTD.
AJAY GUPTA
PRINCIPAL COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
