The Delhi High Court held that the jurisdiction for the issued matter lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal and directed the Registry to transfer the petition accordingly.
Registry directed to transfer petition to Registrar, C.A.T., Principal Bench, New Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. R. K. Mishra with Mr. Vikrant Pratap Singh Rajawat, Ms. Mamata Singh Shukla, Advs. with petitioner in person
versus
THE STATE (N. C. T. OF DELHI) AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Ms. Palak Rohmetra and Ms. Sakshi Shairwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 07.05.2019
The jurisdiction of the issue raised in the present petition lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Accordingly, the Registry is directed to transfer the present petition to the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi placing the matter before appropriate Bench on 13.05.2019.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MAY 07, 2019 ms
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the jurisdiction lies with the High Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal for the issue raised.
Manoj Kumar
The State (N. C. T. of Delhi)
Suresh Kumar Kait
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
