The petitioner sought jurisdiction. The court held the matter falls under the Central Administrative Tribunal and ordered transfer of the petition to the Tribunal.
Transfer of the petition to the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
S. K. CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary and Mr. Brijesh Choudhary, Advocates
versus
MR. RAVIKANT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 03.05.2019
The jurisdiction of the issue raised in the present petition lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Accordingly, the Registry is directed to transfer the present petition to the Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi for placing the matter before appropriate Bench on 08.05.2019.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
MAY 03, 2019 rhc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the jurisdiction lies with the High Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal.
S. K. CHAUDHARY
MR. RAVIKANT AND ORS.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
