Petitioner sought release of detained and subsequently sold gold jewellery. Court disposed of petition directing authorities to process application for sale proceeds within four weeks.
Directing authorities to process the application for release of sale proceeds of gold jewellery within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
MUSLIMA KAZIMI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr N. K. Baksh, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Aakash Varma, Advocates for R-1. Mr Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 03.05.2019
CM No.20556/2019
W.P.(C) 4625/2019
“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that the personal belongings Bengels, [ sic ] Ring, Nickels, of the petitioner, may be released and re-export to the Afghanistan and same may be hand over to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
detention receipt was handed over to the petitioner clearly indicating that the petitioner could re-export the same. The said receipt also bears a notification that if the goods are not cleared within two months of the detention or any other period as extended by the competent authority, action to dispose of the goods under the relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 will be initiated. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that since the petitioner did not take steps for release of the goods within the stipulated period, the customs authorities initiated steps for disposal of the said goods, which were disposed of on 29.03.2016.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MAY 03, 2019 MK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muslima Kazimi
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
