Allowed

Dr. Pankaj Bhardwaj v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC22 Apr 2019W.P.(C)/4113/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of petitions seeking direction to allow petitioners to join as Junior Residents. The Court rejected the need for a fresh work experience application by noting a parallel Writ Petition pending before it involving the same relief, thereby directing the respondents to issue fresh orders allowing the appointment for the remaining six-month period with salary and benefits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to issue fresh orders allowing the petitioner to join as Junior Resident for remaining six months with salary and benefits.

Dr. Pankaj Bhardwaj Vs Union of India and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~39 & 41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 4113/2019

¶4

DR. PANKAJ BHARDWAJ ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through Mr. S. C. Sharma, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ripu D. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel

¶8

- W.P.(C) 4120/2019 & C.M.APPLN. 18596/2019

¶9

DR. CICIL MATHUR ..... Petitioner

¶10

Through Mr. S. C. Sharma, Adv.

¶11

versus

¶12

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Through Mr. Ripu D. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 22.04.2019

¶15

CM APPL. /2019 (Exemption) ( to be numbered) in W.P.(C) 4113/2019

¶16

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶17

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶18

C.M.APPLN. 18596/2019 in W.P.(C) 4120/2019

¶19

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶20

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶21

W.P.(C) 4113/2019 & W.P.(C) 4120/2019

¶22

Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to join as Junior Resident (BDS) to complete remaining period of six months in service.

¶23

Respondent no.3 invited application on 26.05.2018 for the post of Junior Resident (Non-PG) (BDS) for the various. The petitioner along with others applied for the post and was called for counselling / test on 25.06.2018. On the basis of the result of counselling, the petitioner was selected and was appointed as Junior Resident for a period of six months on 01.07.2018.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the period of six months was expiring, the respondents proposed to fill the vacancies again from 01.01.2019. Some other junior resident including the petitioner filed O.A.No. 100/4679//2018 before the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The said OA was dismissed vide order dated 22.01.2019. Some of the candidates filed the Civil Writ Petition before this court vide W.P. (C) 1286/2019 and W.P.(C) 2361/2019 by challenging the order of Tribunal and were disposed of vide order dated 08.03.2019 whereby the respondents were directed to issue fresh orders in favour of the petitioners therein for the remaining period of six months.

¶25

As the prayer of the present petition is same as was in the case of W.P.(C) 1286/2019, therefore, I hereby dispose of the present petition

¶26

directing the respondents to issue fresh orders in favour of the petitioner for the remaining period of six months. The petitioner shall be entitled to salary and all consequential benefits from the date he reports for duties.

¶27

It is made clear that order shall be issued by the respondent within one week.

¶28

The petition is disposed of, accordingly.

¶29

A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for both the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

¶30

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶31

APRIL 22, 2019 ms

Dr. Pankaj Bhardwaj v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Pankaj Bhardwaj v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashwath Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Shri Dharampal Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

M/S National Industrial Corporation (P) Ltd. Vs the Excise Commissioner Delhi & Anr.

Harvansh Chawla Vs Pr. Cit (CENTRAL-1), Delhi & Anr.

Satish Kumar & Ors. Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Bhuvanesh Vyas Vs I.G.N.O.U.

Sundeep Bhutoria Vs Indian Federation of United Nations Association & Ors.

Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bureau of Pharma Public Sector Undertakings of India and Anr.

Neeraj Yadav Vs Airports Authority of India

Sanjay Mathur Vs Union of India and Anr.

Vinod Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Prince Kumar Vs Delhi Technological University and Ors.

Poonam Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ankur Vs Directorate of Education and Ors.