The petitioners withdrew the writ petition regarding a stay under CM No. 1532/2019 with liberty to appeal. The withdrawal was allowed along with the pending application.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn along with pending application with liberty to appeal to DRAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57.
NITIN RASTOGI AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Sarvesh Tiwari, Adv.
Versus
ICICI BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjiv Kakra, Adv. with Ms.Vashali Kakra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R
% 15.01.2019
C.M.No.1533/2019 (exemptions)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) No. 324/2019 & C.M.No.1532/2019 (stay)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appeal against the impugned order before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
With the liberty as prayed for, the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JANUARY 15, 2019 ‘anb’
NITIN RASTOGI AND ANR.
ICICI BANK LTD. AND ORS.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
