Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to move the Supreme Court of India. The High Court dismissed the petition and connected application as withdrawn without evaluating merits.
Writ petition and connected application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move Supreme Court of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC Mr. Shlok Chandra, Adv. with Mr. Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move Supreme Court of India. With liberty as prayed for, writ petition and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that we have not gone into the merit of the case and granted liberty to the petitioner to agitate issues before the Supreme Court.
CHIEF JUSTICE
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
JANUARY 15, 2019 /ak
VINAY KUMAR DUBEY
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
