Petitioner withdrew the writ petition to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the SARFAESI Act; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Allowed exemption application subject to just exceptions; dismissed withdrawn writ petition allowing petitioner to approach DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED AND ORS. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Sanya Lamba, Adv. for R1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R
% 12.03.2019
CM. No. 11579/2019 (for Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2490/2019 & CM. No. 11580/2019
After some submissions learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
The petition and the connected application are dismissed as
withdrawn. Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach DRT in accordance
with law.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 12, 2019 /jg
Prateek Gupta
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
