Writ petition challenging failure to consider representations regarding license extension for a hall. Court recorded undertaking to decide within four weeks and disposed of petition.
Order disposed; liberty to challenge future order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM No. 11362/2019
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2434/2019 & CM No. 11361/2019
following prayers:
“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to:
c) Pass any such other and further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.”
Division Bench in the order dated December 11, 2018 inter alia that if the representations are made by the appellants therein, including the petitioner herein, the Competent Authority shall consider the same in terms of the rules and the petitioner having made the representations on December 17, 2018, December 19, 2018, January 07, 2019, January 15, 2019, January 18, 2019 and February 06, 2019 the respondent has not considered the same till date.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 11, 2019 /aky
ARTI RANI
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
