Partly allowed
Pawan Kumar v. the State (Nct of Delhi )
Delhi HCLPA/47/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing withdrawn appeal, allowing exemption, and condoning delay. No substantive issues decided.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw appeal dismissed; exemption allowed; delay condoned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- LPA 47/2019 & CM. Nos. 3030/2019 and 3031/2019
¶4
- PAWAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra and Ms. Harkamljeet Kaur, Advs.
¶5
versus
¶6
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Shiv Prakash, PS-Anand Parbat.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
¶8
- O R D E R
¶9
- % 08.03.2019
¶10
CM. No. 3030/2019 (for exemption)
¶11
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
¶12
Application stands disposed of.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
PAWAN KUMAR
- respondent
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Coram
AI extract
V. KAMESWAR RAO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court