The High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition by a retired CRPF Inspector seeking pay fixation and benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme, relying on recent precedents.
Petition allowed; impugned orders quashed; direction to fix pay scale and grant consequential benefits within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
MAN SINGH ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr KK Sharma, Advocate.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mahender Kr Bhardwaj with Mr Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1 to R-4
Mr Vivek Kr Singh, DC (Law), CRPF with Mr Deepak Kumar, SI, CRPF.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 19.02.2019
CM No.7923/2019
W.P.(C) 1711/2019
W.P(C) 1711 of 2019 Page 1 of 2
Constable on 9th March 1998 and further completed 24 years of service on 23rd May 2007. It is stated that subsequent to being promoted as an Inspector on 18th August 2014, the Petitioner retired from service on 30th November 2017.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 19, 2019/tr
W.P(C) 1711 of 2019 Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a retired CRPF Inspector is entitled to second financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme with consequential benefits.
Whether the delay in granting the benefit due to service record discrepancies invalidates the claim.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajbir Singh v. Union of IndiaRelied on¶20
W.P.(C) 9893/2018
SI/GD Shambhu v. Union of IndiaReferred¶21
W.P.(C) 9359/2016
Jas Ram v. Union of IndiaReferred¶21
W.P.(C) 332/2017
Man Singh
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
S. Muralidhar and Sanjeev Narula
Parties & counsel
