This is a single-judge order dismissing a writ petition seeking a direction to retain a government pool accommodation beyond the statutory limit on medical grounds. The Court held that the petitioner had occupied the accommodation beyond the permissible two years and dismissed the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 26 + W.P.(C) 1606/2019 S.S.N BHAI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Vijaya Lakshmi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 18.02.2019
CM 7377/2019 (exemption)
W.P.(C) 1606/2019 & CM 7376/2019 (direction)
3.This Court had, at the first hearing of the petition on 15th February 2019, inquired from the learned counsel for the Petitioner whether the Petitioner is willing to give an undertaking that he will handover peaceful and vacant
possession of the accommodation to the Respondents positively on or before 31st March, 2019. She had sought time for instructions. Therefore, the case was adjourned for today.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 18, 2019 rd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court may retain a pool accommodation beyond the permitted period on special medical grounds.
Whether the notice to vacate issued to the petitioner was unreasonable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.S.N BHAI
UNION OF INDIA
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
