The bench disposed of caveats and allowed exemption in CM applications. The main appeal and application were dismissed based on a prior judgment dated 12th February 2019 in a related matter.
Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; caveat disposed of; appeal and application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Saurabh Prakash, Advocate with Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocate.
versus
SUPRIYO MUKHERJEE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Advocate for Mr. Gulshan Chawla, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 15.02.2019
CM No. 7035/2019 & CM No. 7036/2019 (exemption)
Cav. 146/2019
LPA 110/2019 & CM No. 7034/2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 15, 2019/ ss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal and application pray to be allowed in light of judgment dated 12th February 2019 passed in LPA No. 97/2019
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
LPA No. 97/2019Followed¶15
M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED
SUPRIYO MUKHERJEE
S MURALIDHAR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
