This order dismissed a modification application in W.P.(C) No.1605/2018, held as there are no grounds to modify the previous order.
The application for modification of the order is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB-1
DEEPAK KUMAR SINSINVAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Naushad Alam with Mr.Jitendra Bharti, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pratyush Miglani, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 05.07.2019
CM Appl.No. 21943/2019 (modification)
No grounds are made out for modification of the order. The application is dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 05, 2019 / tr
DEEPAK KUMAR SINSINVAR AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
S.MURALIDHAR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
