Petitioners withdrew this writ petition on land. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to seek other appropriate remedy.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek other appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
IBRAHIM & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Manish Vashisht, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates for Respondent/UOI Mr. B.Mahapatra, Advocate for LAC
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 11.01.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
JANUARY 11, 2019
mw
Ibrahim & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
