The High Court of Delhi granted the petitioner permission to withdraw the writ petition to file an appeal in CESTAT. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. The underlying appeal in CESTAT disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL DRI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Adv. Versus
M/S ITS MY NAME PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhuri and Mr.Tarun Gulati, Sr.Advs. with Mr.Abhishek Malhotra, Mr.Akshay Anand, Ms.Ragini Awasthy, Ms.Yashasvika Sharma, Mr.Harshit Sethi, Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Mr.Keshavam Chaudhri, Mr.Amanjot S.Ahluwalia, Advs for R-1. Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv. with Mr.Aman Rewaria, Ms.Vipasha Mishra, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 10.12.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from the clients, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition so that an appeal can be preferred against the impugned order dated 13th November, 2019 passed by CESTAT, Principle Bench, New Delhi in Customs Appeal No.52593/2019.
Permission is granted and the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 10, 2019/ ‘anb’
PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL DRI
M/S ITS MY NAME PVT. LTD.
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
