Petitioners sought to declare land acquisition proceedings lapsed under the 2013 Act due to non-possession and non-payment of compensation. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition regarding delay.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
RAJAN SHARMA & ORS.
..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sukhbir Sejwal, Advocate.
versus
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon Court may be pleased to issue a writ / order / direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records of the acquisition proceedings with respect to the lands comprised in khasra No. 187(3-07), 188(4-16), 216(1-16), 219/1(1-03), 220(4-16), 221(4-00), 222/1(3-1 l),222/2(l-05) 223(4-16), 224(4-16), 226(2-08), 229/2(4-08), 230(4- 16), 240/1(00-17), 245(4-16), 246(4-16), 247(1-18), total measuring 58 Bighas 5 Biswas situated in the revenue estate of Village Pul Pehladpur, New Delhi, acquired vide Award. 207/1986-87 of the petitioners and further to pass appropriate writ, order or directions declaring the acquisition proceedings to have lapsed and have become inoperative under sec.24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act of 2013 as physical possession of the lands of the petitioners comprised in
Idiasra No.s 187(3-07), 188(4-16) 216(1-16), 219/l((l-03), 220(416), 221(4-00),226(2-08), 229/2(4-08) has not been taken and no compensation in respect of acquired land has been paid to the petitioners and their predecessors.”
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
JANUARY 10, 2019 nk
RAJAN SHARMA & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
S. MURALIDHAR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
