A writ petition where the petitioner requested liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a proper one. The bench dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty requested.
Petitioner granted liberty to withdraw the petition and liberty to file a proper petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
28 + W.P.(C) 1102/2019
MD. ABDUL AHAD AZIM AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Sameer Rai, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sumit Rajput, Advocate for R-1. Ms Aastha Jain and Mr Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 04.02.2019 CM 5032/2019 (exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 1102/2019
2.Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a proper petition, including explaining the delay in approaching the Court for relief.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2019 rd
Md. Abdul Ahad Azim and Ors.
Union of India and Ors.
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
