This petition was withdrawn by the learned counsel on behalf of the party with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. The writ petition and connected application were dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
CONSTABLE MOOL CHAND YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. H. S. Tiwari, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R 01.02.2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 01, 2019 nk
Constable Mool Chand Yadav
Union of India
S. Muralidhar
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
