The High Court of Delhi treated the petitioner's writ petition as a representation concerning her inability to meet semester attendance due to sickness, directing Respondent No.2 to decide it within two weeks before disposing of the writ.
The writ petition was disposed of; Respondent No.2 to treat it as a representation and decide within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MEGHNA BALI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Bali with Mr. L.K. Giri & Mr. G.S. Randhawa, Advs.
versus
PRINCIPAL IIMT AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Ekta Sikri with Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri & Ms. Ritu Pama, Advs. for R-2/GGSIPU.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 09.10.2019
W.P.(C) No.10017/2019
W.P.(C) No.10017/2019 Page 1 of 2
decided by respondent No.2 as early as possible and practicable, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Semesters VIII, IX and X have already been cleared by the petitioner without there being any deficiency in the attendance. These aspects may be appreciated by the respondent No.2.
CM APPL. No.41442/2019
In view of the order on the writ petition, no further orders are required to be passed on this application.
The same stands disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
OCTOBER 09, 2019 kks
W.P.(C) No.10017/2019 Page
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be treated as a representation regarding the student's inability to meet attendance requirements due to sickness.
Meghna Bali
Principal IIMT
GGSIPU
C. Harishankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
