This writ petition seeking a permanent Fast Track and Commercial Court scheme was dismissed. The Court noted that the required posts had already been sanctioned by the Government via a communication dated August 8, 2019, making further judicial intervention unnecessary.
petitions prayers dismissed as posts were already sanctioned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
Date of Decision: 1st October, 2019
PRAG CHAWLA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Chander & Mr. Gurdeep Chauhan, Advs.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Mr. Mihir Saraswat & Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advs. for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
c) Pass any other order(s) which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, in favour of the Petitioner.”
W.P.(C) 3939/2019 Page 1 of 2
communication dated 8th August, 2019 from the Principal Secretary (Law, Justice & LA) to the Registrar General of this Court, nothing much is required to be monitored by this Court as the posts for the Fast Track Courts as well as for the Commercial Courts have already been sanctioned. Photocopy of the communication dated 8th August, 2019 placed before this Court is taken on record. A copy whereof has been given to the counsel for the petitioner.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
OCTOBER 01, 2019 ns
W.P.(C) 3939/2019 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a permanent scheme for Fast Track Courts and Commercial Courts after the posts were already sanctioned.
PRAG CHAWLA
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
D.N. PATEL
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
