Petitioners failed to appear on the last date of hearing and again did not appear on the current date. The court dismissed the writ petition in default and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocate for Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 15.04.2019
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. 12.02.2019. Same is the position today. Thus, it seems that the petitioner is no more interested to prosecute the present petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default and for nonprosecution as well.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
APRIL 15, 2019 rhc
MONU SHARMA & ORS
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
