Disposed

Subrata Sen v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC12 Apr 2019W.P.(C)/3809/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition sought implementation of the MACPS and arrears. The court directed the respondents to decide on the specific agenda item regarding the petitioner's MACPS eligibility within two months or shortly thereafter and communicate such decision.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide on the petitioner's MACPS eligibility within two months and communicate the decision.

Subrata Sen Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 3809/2019 SUBRATA SEN ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Pallav Mongia, Adv. with Mr.Mridul Chakravarty, Adv.

¶4

versus

¶5

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC with Mr.Zahid Hanif, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-4 to 6.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 12.04.2019

¶7

CM APPL. 17390/2019 (Exemption)

¶8

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(C) 3809/2019

¶11

Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction as under:

¶12

A. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order upon the respondents to immediately implement the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) with regard to the petitioner by granting him financial upgradation under MACP-1 w.e.f. 01.09.2008 along with arrears, as he has become eligible for the same since the year 2007 and

¶13

the said school has already accepted MACPS and also implemented benefits of financial upgradation under MACP1/MACP-2 with regard to its staff (both teaching and nonteaching) in the past, in the years 2013 and 2016;

¶14

B. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or other upon the respondents to immediately release the consequential financial benefits arising therein along with arrears to the petitioner in terms of and in continuance of prayer A hereinabove, within a reasonable period of time.

¶15

To this effect, the School Management Committee/respondent has taken up the case of the petitioner in a meeting held on 20.02.2016, in Agenda 4 which is at page 76, Annexure-9 of the present petition and the said issue has to be finally decided by the Education Department of NCT of Delhi.

¶16

It is stated by counsel for the petitioner that till date, no decision has been taken by the Government of NCT of Delhi.

¶17

Therefore, I hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondent nos.1 to 4 to take decision on Agenda 4 mentioned above, within two months from the receipt of this order, if not already taken and the decision so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate Forum.

¶18

It is made clear that if the decision has already taken, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner within two weeks from the receipt of this order.

¶19

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of.

¶20

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J

¶21

APRIL 12, 2019 ab

Subrata Sen v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subrata Sen v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajni Gupta Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Sunaina Devi Smarak Shikshan Prashikshan Sansthan Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Thermo Fisher Scientific India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare and Ors.

Union of India Vs Dr. Nutan Tahkur

Mohd Akbar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sanjay Mathur Vs Union of India and Anr.

Lajinder Singh Vs S.D.M.C and Anr.

Prashant Deep Vs High Court of Delhi

Mr. Vipin Vs Airport Authority of India

Ravinder Kumar & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Bhavya Saini Vs Union of India

Nehal Ahad Vs Punjab National Bank

Mitul Goel Vs Food Corporation of India & Ors.

Santanu Das Vs National School of Drama & Ors.