The petitioner moved to withdraw the petition while securing liberty to file a review. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and granted the requested liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file review petition before the appropriate bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
STANDARD CASTING PVT LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bhuvan Guglani, Advocate
versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.M. Kalra & Ms. Sonali Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 14.03.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition seeking liberty to file review petition before the appropriate bench on the original side of this Court vis-avis the order dated 19.12.2016 in OMP 539/2011 on the basis of rulings of this Court reported as Guiness World Records Ltd. vs. Sababbi Mangal 230 (2016) Delhi Law Times 377 and Kamal Sharma & Ors. vs. Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 229 (2016) Delhi Law Times 438.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
Dasti under the signatures of Court Master.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
nk
MARCH 14, 2018
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Guiness World Records Ltd. vs. Sababbi MangalReferred¶9
Guiness World Records Ltd. vs. Sababbi Mangal 230 (2016) Delhi Law Times 377
Kamal Sharma & Ors. vs. Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.Referred¶9
Kamal Sharma & Ors. vs. Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 229 (2016) Delhi Law Times 438
STANDARD CASTING PVT LTD
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition to transfer a civil case from one court to another.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
