Anju Bajaj v. Sudarshan Kumari Nayyar & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi allowed an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court noted the parties had resolved their dispute via a settlement report and an oral family settlement. The impugned judgment was modified accordingly, the appeal disposed of as settled, and the suit decreed as settled.
What did the court decide?
The application was allowed; the impugned judgment/decree was modified as per the MoU; the appeal was disposed of as settled; the suit was decreed as settled; court fee was directed to be refunded.