Orient Tyres v. Arjun Uppal & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hearing an application for extension of time to vacate premises following an eviction order.
What did the court decide?
Extension of time to vacate premises on or before 30th June 2018 granted subject to payment of user charges.
What the court decided
$~ 42
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 96/2017
ORIENT TYRES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate.
versus ARJUN UPPAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 14.03.2018
CM No.9928/2018 (for extension of time)
On the eviction petition of the respondents on the ground of bona fide need the additional rent controller passed an eviction order dated 22.08.2016 against the applicant/petitioner. The revision petition was dismissed by order dated 01.02.2018, the said order having since become final and binding.
By the application at hand, the applicant seeks enlargement of time. The first respondent appearing on his behalf and on behalf of co-petitioner before the rent controller, is present with his counsel on advance copy being served. The counsel for the non-applicant/respondents, on instructions, submits that his client is agreeable to extended period being granted to the applicant to vacate the subject premises on or before 30th June, 2018, provided the applicant pays user/occupation charges @ Rs.14,000/- per month with effect from 1st August, 2016.
RC.REV. 96/2017
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Orient Tyres
- respondent
Arjun Upal & Anr
Coram
R.K. Gauba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court