The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Associate counsel sought liberty to withdraw, resulting in the abandonment of appeal LPA 33/2017 and connected matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
J P SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Venkatesh and Mr. Pratyush Singh, Advs.
versus
GAON SABHA SATBARI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal.
LPA 33/2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
rc
APRIL 04, 2018
J P SHARMA & ANR
GAON SABHA SATBARI
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
