Appeal against ITAT order dismissing revenue's challenge. Court found no question of law arose as ITAT confirmed appellant foundings. Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
FOREMOST ESTATE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R % 04.04.2018
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) confirming findings with respect to the assessee’s contentions that the income reported by it as pertaining to ‘income from house property’ was correct, is under challenge in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Revenue. The Assessing Officer (AO) brought to tax the amounts on the ground that the income was derived from business; nevertheless, even though the income was reported as rent, it ought to have been characterized as stock-in-trade.
The AO, based upon a factual analysis, concluded that rental income was consistently reported and accepted for over 10 years and had been also assessed as such. The CIT(A), therefore, granted the relief which was merely confirmed by the ITAT. No question of law arises. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
APRIL 04, 2018/ajk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's findings regarding the characterisation of income as 'income from house property' merit being challenged by the Revenue.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Income Tax-3
Foremost Estate Pvt. Ltd.
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
