The Delhi High Court dismissed an Income Tax appeal where the Revenue challenged an order covered by the decision in CIT v. Kabul Chawla under Article 226, citing issue and clause bar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-18
..... Appellant Through Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel. versus DEVI DASS SANTOSH KUMAR(HUF), ..... Respondent Through Dr.Shashwat Bajpai and Mr.Sharad Agarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
1 The question raised in the appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 19th October, 2016 in ITA No.2348/Del/2012 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2006-07 stands covered against it by the decision of this Court in CIT v. Kabul Chawla 380 ITR 573.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
MAY 04, 2018/ ndn
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CIT v. Kabul Chawla 380 ITR 573Followed¶8
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-18
Devi Dass Santosh Kumar (HUF)
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
