Sathyanarayana Subba Rao Challaghulla Vs Magma Fincorp Limited (Assignee of M/S Ge Money Financial Services Private Limited ) & Ors.

Learned counsel for Assets Recovery and Construction India Limited (‘ARCIL’) states that the appellant can be permitted to raise the question of limitation and other aspects before the Arbitrator, except appointment of a new arbitrator and the arbitration proceedings.

¶14

Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 state that this is acceptable.

¶15

However, learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 state that ARCIL and Magna Fincorp Ltd. had failed and erred in not informing the Court and arbitrator about

¶16

the assignment in favour of ARCIL.

¶17

Be that as it may, we do not think this will be a reason to modify or amend the impugned order. Application for substitution is pending before the Arbitrator, who would decide the same.

¶18

It is pointed out that the arbitrator appointed by the Court has not proceeded with arbitration, as the present appeal was pending.

¶19

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the arbitration proceedings can now continue. Time period for completion of arbitration would commence from today.

¶20

The appeal is disposed of, with no order as to costs. The pending application is also disposed of.

¶21

SANJIV KHANNA, J

¶22

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

¶23

JANUARY 09, 2018 tp

Sathyanarayana Subba Rao Challaghulla v. Magma Fincorp Limited (Assignee of M/S Ge Money Financial Services Private Limited ) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathyanarayana Subba Rao Challaghulla v. Magma Fincorp Limited (Assignee of M/S Ge Money Financial Services Private Limited ) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Il&Fc Engineering & Construction Company Ltd. Vs Paschimanchal Cidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors.

Jai Bhawani Industries Vs Commissioner of Vat & Anr.

Scan Holdings (P) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Indian Wind Power Association Vs Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Power and Anr.

Sh. Harjeet Singh Johar Vs the Commissioner of Customs(General), & Ors.

Ald Automotive(P) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Value Added Taxes Delhi