The Court accepted that a DVRGVAT order dated 21.03.2017 was forged as the file was processed later. It directed costs and an inquiry to ensure no loopholes exist for such fabrication.
Respondents directed to pay Rs.40,000 costs; Vigilance Department directed to examine similar cases and plug loopholes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13.
JAI BHAWANI INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mohit Gautam & Mr. Rohit Gautam, Advocates. Mr. Vasdev Lalwani & Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocates. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Santanu Kanungo & Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. Versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Shadan Farasat & Mr. Ahmed Said, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 08.01.2018
Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate and President of the Delhi High Court Bar Association, Mr. Vasdev Lalwani, Mr. Mohit Gautam and Mr. Rohit Gautam, Advocates are present in the Court. Mr. Mohit Gautam and Mr. Rohit Gautam, Advocates state that they withdraw the letter written by their father Mr. Vinod Gautam, Advocate and apologise for the same.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JANUARY 08, 2018 VKR/NA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
JAI BHAWANI INDUSTRIES
COMMISSIONER OF VAT
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
