Ritu Jain v. Praksh Chand Khatry
Case brief
What is this about?
Execution petition dismissed in default as decree holder died and no representative appeared, despite respondent's claim that decree was satisfied.
What did the court decide?
Execution petition dismissed in default.
What the court decided
$~OS-17
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- EX.P. 92/2017
RITU JAIN ..... Decree Holder
Through None.
versus
PRAKSH CHAND KHATRY ..... Judgement Debtor Through Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Ms.Mallika Bhote, Mr.Anurag Sahay, Mr.Raghav Wadhwa and Mr.Siddhant Kr.Singh, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R % 10.12.2018
Learned counsel for the judgment debtor states that as already pointed out earlier, the decree holder has passed away on 25.06.2018. He further states that the decree stands satisfied.
As none has appeared for the decree holder, the execution petition is dismissed in default.
JAYANT NATH, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RITU JAIN
- respondent
PRAKSH CHAND KHATRY
Coram
JAYANT NATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court