Petitioner sought to withdraw petition after NCLT appointed an IRP against respondent and a claim was admitted. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~CP-16
BLUE STAR LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through Mr.S.K.Gandhi and Mr.Aditya Kapoor, Advs.
versus
MSX MALL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vivek Singh and Mr.Onkar Nath, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
% 07.12.2018
In this case it is stated that the NCLT has appointed an IRP against the respondent. The petitioner has also filed a claim against the said respondent before the IRP which has been admitted by the IRP.
In view of the above, without prejudice to the rights and contentions learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JAYANT NATH, J
DECEMBER 07, 2018 n
BLUE STAR LIMITED
MSX MALL PVT. LTD.
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
