The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal revision petition. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly. No substantive legal principle is laid down as the matter was disposed of only by order.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJNISH ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Surinder Singh with Mr. J.K. Singh and Mr. Yogesh Chauhan, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. ASi Babita, PS Nabi Karim.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 18.01.2018
CRL.REV.P. 47/2018 & Crl.M.A. 976/2018 (stay)
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 18, 2018 st
Rajnish
The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
