Quashed

Sheeshpal @ Luv v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC18 Jan 2018CRL.M.C./256/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge quashed the FIR regarding an alleged attempt to cause hurt between neighbours who had settled their dispute amicably. The petitioner, a minor, agreed to deposit costs with the Delhi Child Welfare Fund.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.1004/2015 and consequent proceedings quashed; petitioner to deposit Rs.5,000 with Delhi Child Welfare Fund within two weeks.

Sheeshpal @ Luv Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 256/2018

¶4

SHEESHPAL @ LUV ..... Petitioner Through : Mr Kapil Singhal, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

¶7

..... Respondent

¶8

Through : Mr Arun Kumar Sharma, Addl. PP for the State. SI Prashant, PS N.V.Pur.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R

¶11

% 18.01.2018 Crl. M.A. 992/2018(exemption)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

CRL.M.C. 256/2018

¶14

The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1004/2015 under Sections 308/323/34 IPC, Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi.

¶15

It is contended that on account of an altercation and misunderstanding, subject incident happened. The parties are neighbours and have settled their dispute. The petitioner is present in Court and expresses remorse and submits that his father has predeceased, and he is only bread earner of the family and has to support his old mother and a younger brother.

¶16

Crl.M.C.256/2018

¶17

Page 1

¶18

Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are present in Court and are identified by the Investigating Officer. They state that, being neighbours, they have amicably settled with the petitioner, with the intervention of elders and other neighbours and have resolved their dispute to restore peace and harmony in the neighbourhood.

¶19

In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute and age of the petitioner is only 19 years and Respondents No. 2 and 3 do not wish to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶20

In view of the above, the subject FIR No.1004/2015, under Sections 308/323/34 IPC, Police Station New Usmanpur as well as the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, subject to the petitioners depositing cost of Rs.5,000/- with the Delhi Child Welfare Fund ”, Department of Women and Child Development, 1A, Canning Lane, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, within a period of two weeks from today. Receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of three weeks from today.

¶21

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

¶22

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

¶23

JANUARY 18, 2018/ ‘Sn’

¶24

Crl.M.C.256/2018

¶25

Page 2

Sheeshpal @ Luv v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheeshpal @ Luv v. the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabha Tandon & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Juhi Kumari Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Rinku Das Vs State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Naseem @ Sonu Vs the State & Anr.

Braham Prakash Deswal & Ors. Vs the State & Anr.

Rajnish Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi