The State sought leave to appeal against the Trial Court's acquittal of a female Respondent in a POCSO case where her husband died during the trial. The High Court held that no grounds were made out to disturb the acquittal, as it was not persuaded by the submissions, and dismissed the petition.
Leave to appeal is not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
STATE ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) along with SI Veer Baksh, PS S.B. Dairy.
versus
ANJU GOYAL ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 17.08.2018
Crl.M.A. 30135/2018 (exemption)
Crl.M.A. 30134/2018 (delay)
CRL.L.P. 539/2018
against him abated by order dated 7th October, 2016 passed by the Trial Court.
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
AUGUST 17, 2018
“shailndra/sandeep”
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal against an acquittal by the Trial Court under the POCSO Act should be granted.
Whether grounds for setting aside the acquittal of the Respondent exist.
STATE
ANJU GOYAL
S.MURALIDHAR
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
