This order notes compliance with a Supreme Court order regarding Respondent No. 5 and disposes of the pending writ petition and criminal matters in light thereof, cancelling the next date list.
No further orders called for; disposed of in terms of Supreme Court order dated 16th July, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ARADHANA KAKKAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh & Ms. Nandita Mishra, Advocates
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms.Eshita Baruah, Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. K.S.Pathania & Mr. Abadh Kishor Singh, Advocates for Respondent no.5 Mr. Dharmender Bhan, Advocate in person
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R
% 09.08.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
AUGUST 09, 2018 /mw
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Supreme Court of IndiaReferred¶9
SLP (Crl.) Nos. 5269-5281/2018
ARADHANA KAKKAR
UNION OF INDIA
S. MURALIDHAR
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
