The High Court of Delhi dismissed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 as withdrawn by the petitioner, who intended to raise related arguments on conviction and sentence in a pending appeal.
Criminal writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise submissions regarding conviction and sentence in a pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Vinod Kumar, Crime Branch Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 17.07.2018
After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He states that he will raise his submissions in relation to conviction and sentence in his appeal which is already pending.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
JULY 17, 2018 N.Khanna
SUKHDEV SINGH @ SUKHA
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
