Sushil Arora v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
/
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
Respondent Represented by: Ms.Suman Saharan, proxy counsel for Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Bijender, PS Shalimar Bagh.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER
%
16.07.2018
©
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset seeks leave to withdraw the petitions.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 16, 2018
'rk'
W.P.(CRL)850/2017 & conn, matters'
page 2 of 2
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court