Panna Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The dismissal of W.P.(CRL) 1744/2018 as withdrawn. Concurrently, exemption application Crl.M.A. No. 10816/2018 was allowed subject to all just exceptions.
What did the court decide?
The petition dismissed as withdrawn; exemption application allowed subject to exceptions.
What the court decided
$~13
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1744/2018
PANNA LAL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sachin Aggarwal, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Sumit Dalal, PS Bhalswa Dairy.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA O R D E R % 13.07.2018
Crl.M.A. No. 10816/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 1744/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is the complainant of FIR No. 211/2015 under Sections 120B/34/420/448/468/471 IPC registered at PS Bhalaswa Dairy and one of the accused is not traceable.
At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Panna Lal
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court