Disposed

Nitin Chauhan v. State through CBI

Delhi HC20 Mar 2018W.P.(CRL)/830/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge Bench disposed of two writ petitions seeking parole bail, directing the competent authority to decide the pending representations on merits within two weeks. The Court also ordered the successful impleadment of the NCT of Delhi as a necessary party.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent authority to decide the petitioners' parole representations on merits within two weeks.

Nitin Chauhan Vs State through CBI — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA

¶2

¶3

-i

¶4

versus STATE THROUGH CBI Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhadari, SPP with Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC forNCT of Delhi.

¶5

I \

¶6

' r

¶7

W.P.(CRL) 830/2018 NITINCHAUHAN Petitioner Through : Mr.Khalil Ansari with Mr.Sunil Sagar and Mohd.Akhtar, Advocates, versus STATE TITROUGH GBI Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhadari, SPP with Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate. Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for NOT of Delhi.

¶8

W.PTCRL) 835/2018 NEERAJ KUMAR Petitioner Through : Mr.Khalil Ansari with Mr.Sunil Sagar and Mohd.Akhtar, Advocates, versus STATE THROUGH CBI Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjeev Bhadari, SPP with Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocate.

¶9

Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for NCT of Delhi.

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶12

ORDER

¶13

% 20.03.2018

¶14

The above writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section A82 Cr.P.C. seeking parole for a particular duration in case bearing R.C.No.6(s)/2009 registered under Sections 120 B read with Sections W. p. (CrI.) 822/18 & comected matters P - of 3

¶15

302/364/201 IPC and Sections 364/302/201/218 IPC to engage an advocate to file SLP.

¶16

Learned SPP appearing for CBI informs that NCT,of Delhi is a necessary party and be impleaded in the present proceedings. 3. At the oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, NCT of Delhi is impleaded as party. Amended memo of parties shall be filed during the course of the day.

¶17

Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC puts appearance on behalf of NCT of Delhi.

¶18

During the course of arguments, it was informed that the representations filed by the petitioners seeking parole before the competent authority are pending and no decision so far has been taken.

¶19

It is agreed during hearing that the competent authority shall dispose of the representations of the petitioners for consideration of parole on merits within two weeks.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the disposal of the petitions with the above directions.

¶21

The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of with the directions that representations of the petitioners seeking parole shall be decided by the competent authority on merits within two weeks.

¶22

^.GARG, J.

¶23

MARCH 20, 2018/sa

¶24

W.P.(Crl.) 822/IS & connected matters

¶25

Page 3 of 3

Nitin Chauhan v. State through CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Chauhan v. State through CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahid Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Sunita Bansal Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Charanjeet Singh & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Charanjeet Singh & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Muslim Vs State

Dharambir Vs the Statr of NCT of Delhi

Baker Street through Its Director Rohit Agarwal Vs Sdmc & Ors.

Virender Saxena & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

A K Jajodia Vs State Thr. CBI

Narayan Waman Nerukar Vs State Thr. CBI

Shahid Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Puran Chand Vs Narcotic Control Bureau

G.D. Bhatt Vs the State through CBI

Rajesh Bisht Vs State through CBI